Assessing the economic and data management impacts of precision agriculture among smallholder farms in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53704/Keywords:
Precision agriculture, Economic Sustainability, Data management, Smallholder farms, Sustainable developmentAbstract
This study provides an econometric analysis of the impact of precision agriculture (PA) technologies on the economic sustainability and data management practices of smallholder farms in Nigeria. While PA technologies promise to enhance productivity and optimise resources, their adoption among smallholder farmers, who form the backbone of agriculture in developing economies, remains constrained. This study fills a critical research gap by employing a mixed-methods approach that combines survey data from 250 smallholder farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria, with 20 in-depth interviews. An Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression model was used to analyse the relationship between a PA technology adoption index and economic sustainability, measured as net farm income per hectare. Pre-estimation diagnostics confirmed the model's suitability, and post-estimation robustness checks affirmed the core findings. The model showed a strong fit (Adjusted R² = 0.68), indicating that a one-unit increase in the PA adoption index is associated with a statistically significant increase in net farm income (β = 0.38, p < 0.01). Qualitative findings reveal that while PA improves data management for better decision-making, significant adoption barriers, notably high initial costs, lack of technical knowledge, and poor infrastructure, persist. The novelty of this study lies in its development of a PA adoption index tailored to the Nigerian context and its mixed-methods validation of the economic benefits and systemic barriers. The findings suggest that targeted policy interventions, including financial support, bespoke training programs, and improved data infrastructure, are essential to unlock the transformative potential of precision agriculture for sustainable development.
References
1. Adebayo A, Ojo T. Constraints to precision agriculture adoption among smallholder farmers in Southwest Nigeria. J Agric Ext. 2022;26(3):54-65.
2. Lowenberg-DeBoer J, Erickson B. Setting the record straight on precision agriculture adoption. Agron J. 2019;111(1):1552-1569.
3. Daum T, Birner R. Agricultural mechanisation in Africa: Myths, realities, and an emerging research agenda. Glob Food Sec. 2020;26:100363.
4. Ogunbiyi A, Kassam L. The political economy of agricultural technology: A case study of tractor-for-hire services in Nigeria. J Agrar Change. 2024;24(1):112-130.
5. Zhang N, Wang M, Wang N. Precision agriculture - a worldwide overview. Comput Electron Agric. 2022;36(2-3):113-132.
6. Tsan M, Totapally S, Hailu M, Addom BK. The digitalisation of African agriculture report 2018–2019. Wageningen (Netherlands): CTA; 2021.
7. Fafchamps M, Söderbom M. Digital agriculture in Africa: A review of evidence and a research agenda. World Bank Res Obs. 2022;37(2):228-261.
8. Mulla DJ. Twenty-five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosyst Eng. 2013;114(4):358-371.
9. Schimmelpfennig D. Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture. Washington (DC): USDA-ERS Economic Research Report No. 217; 2016.
10. Aubert BA, Schroeder A, Grimaudo J. IT as an enabler of sustainable farming: An empirical analysis of farmers' adoption decision of precision agriculture technology. Decis Support Syst. 2012;54(1):510-520.
11. Khanna R, Rao A. Big data analytics in agriculture: Applications and challenges. Int J Comput Appl. 2020;177(1):23-30.
12. Kamilaris A, Fonts A, Prenafeta-Boldú FX. The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;91:640-652.
13. Aker JC, Ghosh I. Mobile phones, agricultural extension, and farmer behaviour: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Ghana. J Dev Econ. 2023;161:103015.
14. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
15. Klerkx L, Begemann S. Supporting food systems transformation: The what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems. Agric Syst. 2020;184:102901.
16. Wainaina P, Jones SK. From pixels to plots: The challenge of translating geospatial data into actionable advice for smallholder farmers in Kenya. Agric Syst. 2023;205:103578.
17. Onyango CM, Nyaga JM, Wambugu SK. Precision agriculture adoption and its effect on smallholder farm profitability in Kenya. East Afr J Agric Sci. 2021;14(2):45-58.
18. Akaninyene UU, Etim NA, Akpan SB. Determinants of precision farming technology adoption among oil palm farmers in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. J Agric Sci Technol. 2024;26(1):112-128.
19. Sanchi ID, Musa MW, Abdullahi A. Rising input prices and agricultural productivity in northwest Nigeria: Challenges and coping strategies. Niger J Agric Econ. 2022;12(3):34-47.
20. Abokyi E. High transport and procurement costs as constraints to smallholder profitability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ghana J Agric Econ. 2020;8(1):22-36.
21. Zhang H, Zhang Y. Digital economy, agricultural technology innovation, and green total factor productivity: Evidence from China. Sustain Dev. 2023;31(2):299-314.
22. Dibbern T, Finger R. Drivers and barriers to the adoption of digital agriculture: A systematic review. Agric Syst. 2024;205:103409.
23. FAO. The state of food and agriculture 2020: Overcoming water challenges in agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2020.
24. Ghimire R, Shrestha S, Ghimire S. Financial constraints and technology adoption in agriculture: Evidence from Nepal. J Rural Stud. 2021;82:1-10.
25. Klerkx L, Rose D. Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Glob Food Sec. 2020;24:100347.
26. Papadopoulos G, Finger R. Economic and environmental benefits of digital agricultural technologies: A systematic review. Agric Syst. 2024;204:103436.
27. Rijswijk K, Klerkx L. Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A review of the literature. Agric Syst. 2021;185:102944.
28. World Bank. Enabling the business of agriculture 2019. Washington (DC): World Bank Group; 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jamiu Adeniyi Yusuf, Abdulbaaki Bolaji Akinola

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Fountain Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. Articles in FUJNAS are published on the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0).
