Comparative Response of Conventional and Quality Protein Maize Hybrids to High Population Densities in the Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria

Authors

  • O. B. Bello Department of Biological Sciences, Fountain University, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria.
  • J. Mahmood Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53704/fujnas.v2i1.40

Abstract

Optimum plant population is very important in enhancing high and stable grain yield especially in quality protein maize (QPM) production. A field trial was therefore conducted to compare the performance of six hybrids (three each of QPM and normal endosperm) at three population densities using a split-plot design at the sub-station of the Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Oke-Oyi, in the southern Guinea savanna zone of Nigeria during the 2010 and 2011 cropping seasons. Plant population -1 densities (53,333, 66,666, and 88,888 plants ha ) constituted the main plots and the six hybrids were assigned to the subplots, replicated three times. Our results showed a differential response of maize -1 hybrids to high densities, with plant populations above 53,333 plants ha reduced grain yield, and this is more pronounced in QPM than normal endosperm hybrids. This is contrary to the results observed in many other countries. This might be that the hybrids were selected in low yield potential area at low plant densities, and hence not tolerant to plant density stress. It may also be due to low yield potential of the experimental site, which does not allow yield increases at high plant densities. Though normal endosperm hybrids 0103-11 and 0103-15 as well as QPM Dada-ba were superior for grain yield among -1 the hybrids at 53,333 plants ha , hybrid 0103-11 was most outstanding. Therefore, genetic improvement of QPM and normal endosperm hybrids for superior stress tolerance and high yield could be enhanced by selection at higher plant population densities.

Keywords: Quality protein maize, normal endosperm, stress tolerance, grain yield

References

Ababaji, B. A., Aibrahim, Y. B., Amahadi, M. A., Bjaliya, M. M., Ayahaya, R. A., Asharifai, A. I.,

Amukhtar, A. A., Bsani, B. M., Bibrahim, A. and Amuhammad, A. A. (2012). Response of extraearly maize (Zea mays L.) to varying intra-row spacing and hill density. Global Journal of BioScience and Biotechnology 1(1), 110-115.

Abdulai, M. S., Sallah, P. Y. K. and Safo-Kantanka, O. (2007). Maize grain yield stability analysis in full season lowland maize in Ghana. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 9, 41-45.

Abolhassan, M. H,, Herbert, S. J. and Putnam, D.H. (2005). Yield response of corn to crowding stress. Agronomy Journal 97, 839-846.

Abuzar, M. R., Sadozai, G. U., Baloch, M. S., Baloch, A. A., Shah, I. H., Javaid, T. and Hussain, N. (2011). Effect of plant population densities on yield of maize. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 21(4), 692-695.

Ahmad, M., Ahmad, R., Cheema, Z. A. and Ghafoor, A. (2008). Production potential of three maize hybrids as influenced by varying plant density. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 45(4), 413-417.

Ahmad, M., Ahmad, R., Ishaque, M. and Malik, A. U. (2011). Why do maize hybrids respond differently to variations in plant density? Crop and Environment 2(1), 52-60.

Andrade, F., Calvino, H., Cirilo, P. A. and Barbieri, P. (2002). Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal 94, 975-980.

Bello O. B., Abdulmaliq S. Y., Ige, S. A., Mahamood, J., Oluleye F., Azeez, M. A., Afolabi, M. S. (2012). Evaluation of early and late/intermediate maize varieties for grain yield potential and adaptation to a southern Guinea savanna agro-ecology of Nigeria. International Journal of Plant Research 2(2), 14-21.

Bisht, A. S,, Bhatnagar, A., Pal, M. S. and Singh, V. (2012). Growth dynamics, productivity and economics of quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) under varying plant density and nutrient management practices. Madras Agricultural Journal 99 (1-3), 73-76.

Bolanos, J. and Edmeades, G. O. (1996). The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crops Research 31, 233-252.

Buah, S. S. J., Abatania, L. N. and Aflakpui, G. K. S. (2009). Quality protein maize response to nitrogen rate and plant density in the Guinea savanna zone of Ghana. West African Journal

of Applied Ecology, 16, 9-21.

Carcova, J. and Otegui, M.E. (2001). Ear temperature and pollination timing effects on maize kernel set. Crop Science 49, 1816-1822.

Carena, M. J. and Cross, H. Z .(2003). Plant density and maize germplasm in the Northern corn Belt. Maydica 48, 105-111.

Edmeades, G. O., Bolanos, J., Elings, A., Ribaut, J. M. and Banziger, M. (2000). The role and regulation of the anthesis silking interval in maize. In: Westgate, M.E. Boote, K.J., (Eds.), Physiology and Modeling Kernel Set in Maize. CSSA. Madison, WI, pp. 43-73.

Gozubenli, H., Kilinc, M., Sener, O. and Konuskan, O. (2004). Effects of single and twin row planting on yield and yield components in maize. Asian Journal of Plant Science 3, 203-206.

Gözübenli, H. (2010). Influence of planting patterns and plant density on the performance of maize hybrids in the eastern Mediterranean conditions. International. Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12, 556-560.

Hasanuzzaman M., Rahman M. L., Roy, T. S., Ahmed, J. U. and Zobaer. A. S. M. (2009). Pant characters, yield components and yield of late transplanted Aman rice as affected by plant spacing and number of seedling per hill. Advances in Biological Research, 3(5-6): 201207.

Ipsilandis, C. G., and Vafias, B. N. (2005). Plant density on grain yield per plant: Breeding Implication. Asian Journal of Plant Science 4(1), 31-39.

Ibeawuchi I. I., Matthews-Njoku, E., Ofor, M. O., Anyanwu, C. P. and Onyia, V. N. (2008). Plant spacing, dry matter accumulation and yield of local and improved maize cultivars. Journal of America Science 4(1), 1545-1553.

Kamara, A. Y., Menkir, A., Kureh, I., Omoigui, L. O. and Ekeleme, F. (2006). Performance of old and new maize hybrids grown at high plant densities in the tropical Guinea savanna. Communication Biometrics of Crop Science 1, 41-48.

Lashkari, M., Mdani, H., Ardakani, M. R., Golzardi, F. and Zargari, K. (2011). Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of different corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 10(3), 450-457.

Luque, S. F., Cirilo, A. G. and Otegui, M. E. ( 2006). Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in Argentine maize hybrids. Field Crops Research 95, 383-397.

Maoveni, P., Farahani, H. A. and Maroufi, K. (2011). Studying of planting density on yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Advance Environental. Biology 5(7), 1687-1690.

Modarres, A. M., Hamilton, R. I., Dwyer, L. M., Stewart, D. W., Mather, D. E., Dijak, M. and Smith, D. L. (1998). Plant population density effects on maize inbred lines in short season environments. Crop Science. 38, 104-108.

Moraditochaee, M., Motamed, M. K., Azarpour, E. Danesh, R. K. and Bozorgi, H. R. (2012). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density management in corn farming. ARPN Journal of

Agricultural and Biological Sciences. 7(2), 133137.

Mukhtar, T., Arifi, M., Hussain, S., Atif, M., Saleem-ur-Rehman, R. and Hussain, K. (2012). Yield and yield components of maize hybrids as influenced by plant spacing. Journal of Agricultural. Research 50(1), 59-66.

Nik, M. M., Babaeian, M., Tavassoli, A., Asgharzade, A. (2011). Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of corn hybrids (Zea mays L). Science Research Essays 6(22), 4821-4825.

Oikeh, S. O., Carsky, R. J., Kling, J. G., Chude, V. O., Horst, W. J. (2003). Differential N uptake by maize cultivars and soil nitrate dynamics under N fertilization in West Africa. Agriculture,. Ecosystem and Environment 100, 181-191.

Olakojo, S. A., Omueti , O., Ajomale, K, and Ogunbodede, B. A. (2007). Development of quality protein maize: Biochemical and agronomic evaluation. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystem 7, 97-104.

Peykarestan, B. and Seify, M. (2012). Impact of sowing date on growth and yield attributes of pop corn grown under different densities. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 3(1), 85-91.

Reddy, T. H. and Reddi, G. H. S. ( 2004). Principles of Agronomy, In: Plant population, chapter

VIII, Kalyani Pub., Hyderabad, India, pp. 193203.

Sangakkara, U. R., Bandaranayake, R. D., Gajanayake, J. N. and Stamp, P. (2004). Plant populations and yield of rainfed maize grown in wet and dry seasons of the tropics. Maydica, 49, 83-88.

Sangoi, L., Graceietti, M. A., Rampazzo, C. and Bianchetti, P. (2002). Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density. Field Crops Research 79, 39-51.

Sener, O., Gozubenli, H., Konuskan, O. and Kilinc, M. (2004). The effects of intra-row spacings on the grain yield and some agronomic characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Asian Journal of Plant Science 3, 429-432.

Shafi, M., Muhammad, M., Munir, S., Zia-UlQamar, A. S. and Mahmood, Z. (2011). Grain production as influenced by planting pattern in maize. Sarhad Jounal of Agriculture 27(3), 357-361.

Sharifi, R. S., Sedghi, M. and Gholipouri, A. (2009). Effect of population density on yield and yield attributes of maize hybrids.Research. Journal of Biological Sciience, 4(4), 375-379.

Statistical Application Software Institute (2007). Statistical Application Software (SAS) system for windows version 9.2. SAS Institute. Cary, N.C.

Turgut, I., Duman, A. Bilgili, U. and Acikgoz, E. (2005). Alternate row spacing and plant density effects on forage and dry matter yield of maize hybrids (Zea mays L.). Jounal of Agronomy and Crop Science 91, 146-151.

Varga, B., Sve?njak, Z., Kneževi?, M. and Grbesša,D. (2004). Performance of prolific and nonprolific maize hybrids under reduced-input and high-input cropping systems. Field Crops Research 90, 203-212.

Vega, C. R. C., Andrade, F. H. and Sadras, V.O. (2001). Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize. Field Crops Research 72, 165-173.

Widdicombe, W. D. and Thelen, K. D. (2002). Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the northern Corn Belt. Agronomy Journal 94, 1020-1023.

Xue, J. Liang, Z., Ma, H., Lu, H. and Ren, J. (2002). Population physiological indices on densitytolerance on maize in different plant type, Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 13(1), 55-59.

Yadav, S. (2006). Growing quality protein maize: Doubling productivity and profitability. Retrieved 12th May, 2012 from http://www.telesupport.org simplemachines/ index.

Zamir, M. S. I , Ahmad, A. H. Javeed, H. M. R. and Latif, T. (2011). Growth and yield behaviour of two maize hybrids (Zea Mays L.) towards different plant spacing. Cercetri Agronomice Moldova 44(2), 33-40.

Zhang, J. S., Dong, K., Wang, C. H. and Liu, P. (2006). Effects of shading on growth, development and grain yield of summer maize, Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao, 17(4), 657-662.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-28

How to Cite

Comparative Response of Conventional and Quality Protein Maize Hybrids to High Population Densities in the Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. (2013). Fountain Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.53704/fujnas.v2i1.40